Started by afleetphil, December 09, 2015, 02:46:33 PM
Previous topic - Next topicQuote from: Man o Taz on December 10, 2015, 09:05:15 AMGeneral Assembly was an awfully nice horse who looked a lot like his side as well. Why do you prefer him to Risen Star?
What a horse General Assembly was. Secretariat's best son, right?
He runs a record time in the Travers that year and then follows it up with a 1:21 in the Vosburgh to enter into a three way tie for the 3rd with the fastest time in that race - 3rd only to the Dr. himself who blew the race apart with a 1:20.20 which will never be equalled that I can see since they reduced the race to 6 furlongs and 2nd to Left Bank who was incredible that day. Talk about General Assembly's versatility.
Quote from: afleetphil on December 12, 2015, 01:05:00 PMSecretariat has been derided as a stallion because the expectations for him were so unrealistic, it was almost impossible for him to meet them. Through Weekend Surprise and Terlingua, however, he'll show up in pedigrees for generations. He was not a sire of sires though, by any means. I have a full brother to Terlingua--as well as Pancho Villa--Border Ron,
I'd say it's Risen Star because he won the Preakness and Belmont. Risen Star had a nice time in the Belmont. But General Assembly wasn't bad. Then you have to consider Lady's Secret. And Secretariat wasn't a great sire. I say he was especially on the female side.
Quote from: curtis on December 12, 2015, 12:57:36 PM
General Assembly was an awfully nice horse who looked a lot like his side as well. Why do you prefer him to Risen Star?