Started by afleetphil, October 10, 2016, 11:42:03 AM
Previous topic - Next topicQuote from: afleetphil on October 10, 2016, 11:42:03 AMIf Arrogate or Nyquist were to win the BC Classic that horse will win the three-year-old Eclipse, in my opinion. I don't see it happening for the latter, but stranger things have happened. I think that Win-Star is getting out before Exaggerator's rep gets tarnished any further. It's highly unlikely he would get the necessary help from the weatherman on BC weekend.
But winning the Santa Anita, Preakness and Haskell all grade I's should get him 3 yr old horse of the year. Also coming in 2nd in the Kentucky Derby will help.
Quote from: Man o Taz on October 11, 2016, 08:32:03 AMOutwork is the biggest argument as to why no Derby prep should be a Gr 1. He had no chance whatsoever. Creator only had a chance if you paired him with Gettysburg and gave them both part of the award.
Nyquist is the most likely candidate.
I do not think either wins the Classic, and Nyquist is probably a win away from earning the award.
Send him to the Malibu post BC as a warm up for the Pegasus if Darley will let him run again post-BC loss.
Arrogate after the BC loss could try the Clark, but that would not be enough to win him top 3 year old and there are not enough other races left.
I would like Exaggerator to get it, but he is now the default winner if no other three year old wins another race...
With Outwork, Creator and Exaggerator retired there is really not another 3 year old who could make a run at it.
Quote from: Man o Taz on October 12, 2016, 12:16:56 PMI'll take Border Run's pedigree. They had similar chances.😉
No chance whatsoever?
He had one of the best pedigrees of any Derby entrant.
He had shown that he had a lot of talent running a sharp second to Tampa Bay specialist Destin where he came within a length of a track record at 8.5 furlongs.
His next outing, on an off track he delivers a good performance tracking a reasonable pace, and then closes to win the race moving forward further.
The Derby was a big step-up, but the horse had earned a place in the starting gate. The reality is that you often do not know until a race whether a horse is in over his head. Outwork again tracked the leaders and then faded.
But the notion that he had no chance I think it a bit of a stretch.
He was 7th choice on the morning line...that is not what a horse with no chance in the race usually gets. :-)
Quote from: Man o Taz on October 17, 2016, 07:20:42 AMOutwork is a nice enough horse who could have racked up a decent record with a different campaign, like what Baffert did with Cupid. Once Outwork got that Gr1 win though, his record needed to be protected. It's one thing to lose the Derby, getting drilled repeatedly in Gr1's after that would expose him. The best thing that ever happened to Cupid was not winning one of those faux Derby prep Gr1's. Now if he's so inclined, Baffert can continue to develop Cupid and maybe he can step up to bigger things at four.
Well, I think I mentioned the off track and the fact that he was close to a reasonable place in the middle of the track and didn't Trojan Nation get a Mine That Bird trip up the rail?
Heck, the horse was still developing in my mind, but who knows - maybe he just wasn't fast enough. I thought his being close to the stakes record in Tampa showed he could run, but maybe I am wrong. I just loved his breeding.