Quote from: BaroqueAgain1 on June 11, 2016, 07:20:13 PM
From what the TVG guys said while showing a replay of the race, once Kent knew that Exaggerator was done, he wrapped up on his horse. Maybe, if he had kept after the colt with strenuous urging, they'd have finished 7th or 9th instead of 11th...but IMHO, there was no good reason to be that hard on him.
Kent has always been good about taking care of his mounts, and I admire him for that.
Quote from: BaroqueAgain1 on June 12, 2016, 03:55:38 PMSure. His foals race and sell extremely well. Winchell uses quite a few of the breedings for their own broodmares. They lowered his book of mares this year and I think have no intentions of increasing it. If he jumped up to $500,000 next year, it would be warranted and breeders would pay it. We aren't halfway done with the year and he has over $10 million in progeny earnings for 2016.
I wonder if it's possible for Tapit's fee to go even higher.
He sired the winner Creator and third-place Lani in the Belmont. Before that, Tapit sons Frosted and Anchor Down went 1-2 in the Met Mile.
I can't wait to see the new ads from Gainesway.
Quote from: BaroqueAgain1 on June 11, 2016, 07:20:13 PMYeah, I've seen him finish third when he could have been second, fourth when he could have been third many times. Expect it? Sure, admire it? Not so much.
From what the TVG guys said while showing a replay of the race, once Kent knew that Exaggerator was done, he wrapped up on his horse. Maybe, if he had kept after the colt with strenuous urging, they'd have finished 7th or 9th instead of 11th...but IMHO, there was no good reason to be that hard on him.
Kent has always been good about taking care of his mounts, and I admire him for that.
Quote from: BaroqueAgain1 on June 12, 2016, 10:44:49 AM
Whether you use the term 'pacemaker' or 'rabbit,' it has often been common to use one horse to set an honest pace in a race, to perhaps benefit a stablemate. It's hardly "cheating."