Started by Man o Taz, December 22, 2014, 12:19:33 PM
Previous topic - Next topicQuote from: Man o Taz on April 13, 2015, 06:03:18 AMI'm curious as to your reason for this opinion? His sire won in dominating fashion there, his stable predecessor--who was at least as big as he is--won just as impressively there in 2001. Dortmund won a Gr1 at Los Alamitos which has bullring turns, tighter than probably any he'll ever encounter. He runs forwardly placed--something I believe is overblown in terms of success at Pimlico, but shouldn't be to his detriment. Did I miss something about an allergy to crab? Why do you think Pimlico will be a problem?
LOL.
Me too. I thought Madefromlucky would be a strong 2nd.
AP was the class of the race. The question is whether or not he is the class of his generation.
I know you like Dortmund and curtis may be right about how the Derby sets up.
I understand his concern regarding American Pharoah's durability for a Triple Crown run, but I still believe he is the best chance for that to happen.
I think Dortmund and AP ar both suspect at 12 furlongs just as they are suspect at 10. Dortmund's sire won the Derby against a weak field. Pioneer of the Nile was 2nd against a weak field since people give Mine The Bird little respect despite his strong finish's in the Preakness and Belmont Stakes. I do not think Dortmund will like Pimlico at all.
But we have to get through the Derby first. I expect both horses to be well off the pace in the Derby.
Quote from: curtis on April 14, 2015, 12:24:30 PM
I'm curious as to your reason for this opinion? His sire won in dominating fashion there, his stable predecessor--who was at least as big as he is--won just as impressively there in 2001. Dortmund won a Gr1 at Los Alamitos which has bullring turns, tighter than probably any he'll ever encounter. He runs forwardly placed--something I believe is overblown in terms of success at Pimlico, but shouldn't be to his detriment. Did I miss something about an allergy to crab? Why do you think Pimlico will be a problem?
Quote from: Man o Taz on April 29, 2015, 11:28:29 AM
I have sat at the Clubhouse Turn since 2006 at Pimlico and I have sat at the Clubhouse Turn at Churchill Downs for the Breeders Cup and there is a heck of a big difference just visually speaking between the two. The Preakness turns seem much narrower. A big horse, no matter how fleet footed I think could have a problem with navigating such turns with a competitive field. Its just my opinion.
Here is some good for thought:
Churchill Downs
One mile oval with a one mile chute
Homestretch: 80 feet wide
Backstretch: 80 feet wide
4% banking on turns
Distance from six-furlong start to first turn: 1,401 feet
Distance from seven-furlong start to first turn: 2,085 feet
Distance from 1 mile start to first turn: 2,745 feet
Distance from 11⁄16 mile start to first turn: 485 feet
Distance from 11⁄8 mile start to first turn: 815 feet
Distance from 11⁄4 mile start to first turn: 1,463 feet
Distance from 13⁄4 mile start to first turn: 1,401 fee
Distance from final turn to finish line: 1,235 feet
Pimlico
Track Surface
Dirt:
1 mile loam oval; Six-furlong and 1 1/4 mile chutes
Length of stretch from last turn to finish line = 1,152 feet
Track = 70 feet wide.
So you can see the Pimlico track has 10 feet less space which accounts for its reputation for having tighter turns. It also has a shorter stretch by 83 feet.
I know folks at DRF have written articles about the track not being tight turned showing the dimensions of the ovals as being the same, but that is not where the tightness comes in. The tightness comes in in trying to race around those turns with 10 feet less width to the outer rail. At Pimlico the outer rail is 14% closer than it is at Churchill Downs. The stretch as noted is also 83 feet shorter. Thus, a horse rounding the final turn has 10 less feet to maneuver in width wise and 83 feet less of a distance to do it in to win the race if it is closing. It is a challenge. For a big horse like Dortmund navigating in a tight field I believe it could adversely impact him.
Here is an excerpt from the Baltimore Sun article...
http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2002-05-18/sports/0205180008_1_pimlico-preakness-kentucky-derby
This myth of the Preakness being a race for speedsters apparently originated in 1957 after Bold Ruler, a speed horse who later sired Secretariat, finished fourth in the Kentucky Derby. According to Chick Lang, Bold Ruler's jockey, Eddie Arcaro, said after the Derby that his horse would perform better "when we get to Pimlico with those tight turns."
Lang worked at Pimlico from 1959 to 1987, serving as general manager for 21 years and earning the nickname "Mr. Preakness." He became close friends with Arcaro, who captured six Preaknesses, more than any other jockey.
"Like with E.F. Hutton, when Eddie Arcaro spoke, everybody listened," Lang says. "And you know, people are still saying it. Once they get that set in their mind you're not going to change them."
Lang says that if Arcaro, who died in 1997, told him once he told him a dozen times: "Chick, get people to stop saying that. I never should have used the word `tighter.' What I meant was `narrower.' The turns at Pimlico are narrower than they are at Churchill Downs."
Quote from: The Tin Man on February 24, 2015, 04:36:08 PM
Ocho at #1 eh, Taz? Very cool.
I still have Pharoah at #1, if he makes it ... but if not, Ocho would likely be my #1 if he impresses once again in The San Felipe.
Sure would like to see Punctuate run another race at some point in his life. His debut was very impressive.
My eye is on Power Jam now too. His debut was quite impressive.