Quote from: curtis on December 18, 2013, 11:15:44 AM
I remember when the Cushion Track was installed at Hollywood Park, track officials went with that brand because it had the lowest ratio of synthetic material to dirt than any of the competitors while still staying within the parameters set by the CHRB. In other words its the dirtiest synthetic track out there. It is much different to both Del Mar (Poly Track) and Golden Gate (Tapeta). I think you can get a better idea of a horse's ability to run on dirt when they transition from the Hollywood Park surface. Santa Anita, however, is a paved highway. I hope they give Shared Belief a race over the track before the San Felipe, to see whether he likes the track well enough in the afternoon. If not, Team Dorf can ship him east where he can run on a kinder surface--like, I don't know--Interstate 10.
A Christmas wish would be for the Hollywood Park track surface to replace the Del Mar surface. My fear is that to get the Breeder's Cup, Del Mar will go back to dirt, something that was problematic there, especially just before the switch.
Thanks for this post, Curtis, with lots of interesting info.
While with Zenyatta at HP on Saturday, I remarked that when HP shuts down, they should collect all the artificial "dirt" and store it somewhere, to sell it to somebody who wants an artificial surface.
I agree that HP's Cushion Track has been the best Socal artificial surface, although Del Mar may now be giving it a run for its money.
I think last summer's artificial surface at Del Mar only had one fatal breakdown during live racing, and only one fatal breakdown during training. An all-time low.
And remember that the purpose of installing these artificial surfaces was to reduce the super-high breakdown rates at the SoCal tracks when they were all dirt.
By the way, I think Churchill Downs also had only fatal breakdown on dirt during their spring meet in 2013.